CE 4288-001 23868 Senior Engineering Design II  Spring 2010

CRBL 302

John Walton

Email: walton"at"utep"dot"edu

Teaching Assistant: Jose Martinez jamartinez9@miners.utep.edu

Telaquana Mountain, Lake Clark National Park

This course is part one of a two-part senior design course. the primary objective of senior engineering design course is to expose the student to a real-world design or analysis experience. Students work in 3-4 person groups on a project directed by a practicing Professional Engineer or by a Civil Engineering Faculty Member. Secondary goals are to improve written and oral presentation skills and to learn more about engineering design.

Textbook:  To Engineer Is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design (Paperback) by Henry Petroski. The bookstore is getting copies and it is available on Amazon for less than $4 a copy. Note that if you get together with friends the postage (which costs as much as the book) will be reduced.

On first day of presentations each group must turn in a copy of all slides (can print out 2/page) at start of class. Time deadlines are strict. Late work will be penalized 10%/day.

 

 

 
Date
Schedule
January 20

Introduce instructor to design teams and projects. Go over syllabus and expectations. Discuss rubrics and text.

Assignment: Turn in groups and one paragraph summary of project. (550-650 words)

January 27

Professor Austin Marshall

February 3

Guest Speaker (attendance required): Michael Ramirez, P.E.
Parkhill, Smith & Cooper; Engineering Practice

Project summaries and task schedule due  (550 - 650 words) at start of class

 

February 10

Presentation 1: Engineering Ethics Examples: Each group will make a 12 minute presentation covering at least two engineering ethics examples. Pick examples from any two years. Except by permission each group must pick in the order of Group A - Case 1's; Group B - Case 2's, etc. Note that in some listings the first number is the year, the number after the dash is what we refer to here. Everyone in group must speak.

 

February 17

Presentation 1: Engineering Ethics Examples: Each group will make a 12 minute presentation covering at least two engineering ethics examples. Pick examples from any two years. Except by permission each group must pick in the order of Group A - Case 1's; Group B - Case 2's, etc.  Everyone in group must speak.

Turn in your evaluations by 5 PM today to Jose Martinez jamartinez9@miners.utep.edu

 

Sign up for engineering ethics examples for next presentations.

February 24

Group quiz on oral presentation rubric and PowerPoint rubric

Each group is required to make a web page describing their project. The web page should explain the project and introduce the team members. The site does not have to be elaborate or long. UTEP and many private companies supply free web space. During the class we will have project web page walk through's. A random person in each group will be selected to quickly demonstrate the page.

.

March 3

Preliminary Project Presentations (10 minutes). Group order chosen at random. Each presentation will be discussed afterwards.

 

March 10

Preliminary Project Presentations (10 minutes). Group order chosen at random. Each presentation will be discussed afterwards.

 

March 17 (Spring Break)
 
March 24

An individual from each group makes a 7 minute presentation on ethics from Group A, Group B, Group C, Group D, Group E, Group F. Group order and student to present chosen at random.  The group will then lead a class discussion of the issue presented.

 

March 31

Cesar Chavez Day - No Classes

 

 

April 7

An individual from each group makes a 7 minute presentation on ethics from Group A, Group B, Group C, Group D, Group E, Group F. Group order and student to present chosen at random. The group will then lead a class discussion of the issue presented.

 


April 14

Open Book Test on "To Engineer is Human"

April 21 Groups D, C B

Practice Final Presentations (dress rehearsal), 10 minute presentations plus questions   See below for order of presentation: Groups B, C, D

April 28 Groups A, E, F Practice Final Presentations: Groups A, E, F
May 5

Final reports due May 4 as a portion of your web site and emailed to Walton. Final reports must be in MS Word format with a word count of 1800 - 2500 words. Figures are not included in the word count. No typographical or spelling errors are allowed. All appropriate drawings, figures, and tables must be included in the report.

A 200 word summary of your project must be included on the home page of your web site.

We will meet in class to go over Friday's final presentations and how things will be organized.

May 7, Business Room 323, 1 PM

Refreshments, preparation, and waiting during judging are in Room 319

Final Presentations  (need to schedule this), 10 minute presentations plus questions. After the presentations the judges will score the projects, supply feedback to each group, then announce the winner.

We will do a random draw for presentation order at the start. Presentations should be put into the computer at the beginning. Each talk will be 10 minutes plus 3 minutes of questions.   (1.5 hours total). You will be cut off if you talk more than 11 minutes.
You should bring a hard copy of your final report to the presentation and hand it to the judges. The report must also be posted prominently on your web site by Wednesday morning (May 6). Make sure that the links from Walton’s web site to yours are correct.
After the presentations the judges will discuss and rank the projects. Each group will be brought in individually for feedback from the judges. At the end everyone will come back and the winner and runner up will be announced.

Project Students
Claudia Rodriguez Alejandra Gallegos
David Ledesma Jackie Villegas

Group B: Dona Ana Community College Extension

Eric Navarro Miguel Torres
Luis Elias  
Jose Nunez Angel Morales

Group C: Swimming and Fitness Center

Laura Styles Martin Cairanza
Abraham Reza
Jose Heras
Carlos Fuentes  
Alejandra Maynez Alejandra Marco-Chavez
Carlos Chavez Marisol Sierra
Sergio Mendez  
Ruth Garcia Oscar Arzaga
Alfredo Rivera Fernando Sanchez
Adalberto Ordonez  

Group F: Sustainable Upgrades of Homes

Michael Steward
Adam Duran
Saul Magellanes
Tim Engle

Individual

a) test on To Engineer is Human (10%)
b) attendance (10%)

Group

Each group must fill out an evaluation of talks by other groups. The average score on a scale of 1 (worst) to 10 (best) must be 5. The report will include a table showing the individual votes of each team member and the overall ranking. The average score given by each team member must be 5. Due by 5 PM.

Hard copy of slides must be turned in at time of presentation.

a) web page (10%)
b) first oral presentation on ethics (10%)
c) second oral presentation on ethics (10%)
d) quiz on rubrics (5%)
e) preliminary project presentations (10%)
f) final report (10%)
g) Judge Panel Score (25%)

Group Award

The final award presented at the senior banquet will be based upon the average of the class grades for the group and the votes of the judges.

Missed Classes

Anyone who is absent from class when an oral or written report is due will be given a grade of 0% for that assignment. Group will be docked 1/2 letter grade if any member is absent during their presentation.

 

Links:

Center for Ethics in the Professions

Evaluations, First Ethick Presentation

Teams Grades Comments Good Bad
A 5.8 Good time management Speak louder
5.98 Well Organized Too much information on slides
6.13 Good eye contact Watch body language when speaker is presenting
6.75
7.5
AVG 6.432      
B 3.25 Well Organized  Watch hand gestures
3.94 Good time management Too much information on slides
4 Attention getter More eye contact
4.75 Better pronunciation
7.1
AVG 4.608      
C 4.25 Clear understanding of topic Needs to practice more
4.9 Evenly spread out amongst team members Watch the font colors
5.2 Good time management More eye contact
5.5 Watch body language when presenting
5.5
AVG 5.07      
D 4.25 Good time management Confusion and spelling errors on the slides
5.2 Spoke at a good pace Monotone voice
5.57 Slides were well designed Too many pauses during the presentation
5.75
6.75
AVG 5.504      
E 3.25 Slides were well designed Reading the slides
3.68 Good transitions between speakers Not facing the public
4 Work on pronunciations
4.26
4.75
AVG 3.988      
F 1.86 Fluid presentation Facing professor only
4.75 Very knowledgeable of the topic Too much information on the slides
4.75 Improve on organization
4.8 Slides were hard to read
5.63
AVG 4.358      

 

Evaluations (3/10/2010) - Preliminary Project Presentations

Group Grades Comments Good Bad
A 3.8 Good flow in presentation Looking at the slides
4.82 Good knowledge in topic Irrelavent information on the slides
5.5 Great eye contact with the audience Members being distracted while team member was speaking
5.8 Very interactive with audience Watch body language while speaking
5.8 Talking too fast
Avg 5.144
B 2.8 Order of the presentation was done well Reading off note cards
4.3 Slide design Frequent pauses
4.5 Information on the slide was well thought out Improve on eye contact
5.25 Good visual aids Better transitions in presentation
6
Avg 4.57
C 4 Well informative slides Reading off note cards 
4.25 Slides were explained good Watch hand positions, keep out of pockets
4.4 Great eye contact Speaking too fast
5.6 Lack of enthusiasm
5.6
Avg 4.77
D 3.75 Great eye contact Reading off slides
4 Good knowledge of topic Bad transitions
4.3 Slides were well elaborated Pictures not clear in slides
4.72 Improve pronunciations
6.5
Avg 4.654
E 4.8 Good info on the slides Too many pics
4.84 Information was very clear Improve pronunciations
5.42 Great eye contact Speak louder during presentation
5.5
6.25
Avg 5.362
F 5 Transitions between speakers were well done Unequal time for speakers
5.6 Good eye contact Chewing gum during presentation
5.66 Knowledge of topic Small font on slides
5.74 Too much information of slides
6 Better time management
Avg 5.6